Thursday, September 23, 2010

Diagnosis Wenckebach

After learning about some heart conditions in Cardiology yesterday, this is what go passed around my class:
Diagnosis Wenckebach
"Hilarious and Educational!"
For my non-med school friends, it's a problem with the electrical conduction of the heart.  It's a second degree AV block - block between atria and ventricles.

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

List of Interesting Articles/Sites from Friends

Monday, September 20, 2010

Reminder When Things Don't Go as Planned

It's not " 'For I know the plans YOU have for you,' declares the Lord." Instead: " 'For I know the plans I have for you,' declares the Lord. Plans to prosper you and not to harm you; plans to give you hope and a future."


Thanks KP!

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Perspective Pictures and Cute Video of Old Couple

Here's a cute video of an old New York couple (Annie and Danny) that I saw on Cup of Jo blog:
http://vimeo.com/12562270
It's talks about their 27 years of love and ends with Danny's terminal cancer.

Here are some really cool Forced Perspective Photos!  (Thanks LW!)

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Branchial Cysts and First 2nd yr exam

Ah! Just got done with first exam of 2nd year...and here's something I should be studying instead of blogging about...branchial cysts!  Can you believe people come into the office and say it's been in the family for a long time? That their father, grandfather, or uncle had it?...
Branchial Arch Cyst*
Luckily it's just an embryonic malformation and there's really nothing wrong with it except it looks strange.  It can be easily resected surgically!
Look how translucent it is and how cleanly it comes out!*
*Really wanted to site the pics, but can't remember where they came from

Sunday, September 5, 2010

"Fainting" Goats! So funny!

Hahaha! These goats are ridiculous (yes, part of med school experience - YouTube).  
"Very important disease that plagues goats.  It's called myotonia congenita and targets the Cl channels causing sudden paralysis." -MNZ
So funny :D
"Fainting" Goats

Friday, September 3, 2010

Plumpy Nut - Patent or No Patent?

This article makes me so angry at those American companies who don't know anything about Plumpy Nut!!! - which was the therapeutic food for malnutrition produced by the organization I worked for this summer (Project Peanut Butter, run by Dr. Manary): http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/05/magazine/05Plumpy-t.html?_r=3&pagewanted=1&hp It gives a pretty good background about it.

Child being fed Plumpy Nut in Sierra Leone

It talks about Nutriset, the company that has a patent on Plumpy Nut.  In order to make Plumpy Nut, other charity organizations have to first get a license from them.  There was mention that it was unethical because Nutriset was essentially "starving children" by preventing some large corporations from making their own Plumpy Nut and donating it.  Initially, I held the same point of view, but after working for PPB, I think differently.  There were some points that the article failed to mention:
  • Some of the companies suing Nutriset's patent on Plumpy Nut claim that it's essentially like peanut butter and people have been making it for years.  However, it's not true.  It's actually only 25% peanut butter.  The rest of it is a mixture of sugar, soya oil, palm oil, milk powder, emulsifiers, and micronutrients.  The suing companies claim that anybody could have made it, but if so, why hadn't they done that before?  Patenting doesn't always mean it's a new product (which in this case, it actually is), but it can also be using an old product for something different.  
  • Plumpy Nut was not a product that just came out of one days work - it's a product that's been under research, evaluation, and remodeling for at least 10 years, which also equates to millions of dollars in research.  Although it's not technically a drug, it is half way between a drug and food.  While people are unhappy that drugs cost so much money and say that pharmaceutical companies are always out for profit, people are also not aware that it costs about $800 million dollars to create just one drug.  Of course, I'm not advocating for pharmaceuticals, and I'm sure they do want to make profit, but I'm just saying that Plumpy Nut did not come free.  One of the purposes of patents is to guarantee that those who do put in the huge amount of money can actually regain that investment back.  Without these patents, people would not be investing in research for drugs, foods, technologies, anything because anybody else can just take that new idea and make profit off of it without having to invest in research money.
  • Something that's wasn't at all mentioned is that although these U.S. companies have good intentions to make and give out Plumpy Nut, I don't think they really have any idea what's the main issue.  The problem isn't so much the production of Plumpy Nut, but the DISTRIBUTION of it.  It's just so difficult to actually transport Plumpy Nut to the distance corners of districts in Africa where there is no paved road, electricity, running water, or other "essential" services. 
  • Furthermore, even if distribution were easier, Plumpy Nut is meant for children 1-5 who are malnourished.  But if you just distribute it without screening, documentation, and education, people won't understand how to use it, and will in fact sell them rather than treat their kids - it's already a problem in Sierra Leone.  
  • The last point that the article did touch on is that having U.S. corporations making Plumpy Nut will actually take profit away from local producers.  In fact, Nutriset has considered taking the patent off developing countries like those in Africa.  
I have to say, I'm easily swayed to think one way or another.  But while I put out all these arguments for Nutriset, I'm not completely advocating for them.  It's just providing the other point of view.  

Thursday, September 2, 2010

1 Billion for drugs; 2 Billion for military...per day

In class, we just learned that it costs about $800 billion for a pharmaceutical company to make a new drug...which led me to look up the U.S. military spending.

So the U.S. spends $2 billion per day on military, which is $711 billion per year.  

That consists of 47% of the world's spending on military, which is almost how much the rest of the world spends on military COMBINED.   Pie Chart of World Military Spendings


Everyone Should Donate Blood

Just finished watching an episode of BostonMed where a patient took up several pints of blood because he had fallen 15 ft from a ladder and nearly bled to death.  The massive usage of blood donations reminded of an outpatient case in Sierra Leone:


A patient came in while I was shadowing an outpatient doctor.  It turned out she had been to the hospital before because of vaginal bleeding while pregnant, but she had "ran off" - according to the nurse.  The situation was unclear, and depending on who I talked to, I gathered different information.  One source said she was just uncompliant and went home even though she was placed in inpatient care to be looked after.  Another source said she had no one with her, and because in Sierra Leone, in order to get transfusions, you had to have a relative donate blood, she went home to get someone.  In any case, she came back with a relative, but her condition had progressed to a much worse state (perhaps infection?).  


In any case, for all you capable blood donors out there - GO DONATE BLOOD!!!! It's a really great service we have in the States.  Can you imagine how difficult it would be to have to always take a relative with you when you have to go into surgery, and not even knowing if their blood will match yours? And then to be turned away if you didn't have an eligible donor?  So please, if you are more than 110lbs, haven't traveled to a malaria infested country (among other activities that could get you sick), have enough iron - scratch that - even if you don't have enough iron just eat more spinach - GO DONATE BLOOD!
Mothers at the malnutrition clinic in Kwama